Keusote Cancels €16M Elderly Housing Services Procurement Due to Technical Errors
31 Aug 2026
Keski-Uudenmaan hyvinvointialue (Keusote) has cancelled its open tender for the procurement of a built-to-rent elderly housing services unit in Hyvinkää. The procurement, valued at €16 million, was cancelled on 10 June 2026 due to technical or procedural errors. Three tenders were received from medium-sized enterprises. No winner was chosen and the competition is closed. Introduction Keski-Uudenmaan hyvinvointialue (Keusote), the wellbeing services county for Central Uusimaa, conducted an open procedure for the procurement of a built-to-rent elderly housing services unit in Hyvinkää. The procurement sought a long-term lease of purpose-built facilities providing 60 places (20 for 24/7 care and 40 for communal living) on a "turnkey" basis. The procurement had an estimated value of €16 million and was intended to run for 240 months (20 years). Three tenders were received from medium-sized enterprises. However, the procurement was cancelled on 10 June 2026 due to technical or procedural errors. No winner was chosen and the competition is closed. Why This Procurement Matters This procurement was intended to address the growing need for elderly housing services in the Hyvinkää area, providing modern, safe, and accessible facilities for older adults. This procurement mattered because it: Supported elderly care: Aimed to provide 60 places for elderly housing services Significant value: €16,000,000 estimated value Long-term commitment: 20-year lease agreement Turnkey delivery: "Avaimet käteen" (turnkey) principle Accessibility: Accessibility criteria for persons with disabilities included Moderate competition: Three tenders received Cancelled: Due to technical or procedural errors Contract Timeline Previous notice: eaa400b4-fb09-48b5-b2e6-1e33ad33f2ae-01 Schedule change: 2 February 2026 (deadlines only) Supplementary letter 2: 6 March 2026 (clarified contract terms) Procurement cancelled: 10 June 2026 Notice published: 31 August 2026 (OJ S 167/2026) Reason for cancellation: Technical or procedural errors Procurement Overview Keusote conducted an open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Key features include: Single lot: One contract covering the entire elderly housing unit Estimated value: €16,000,000 Duration: 240 months (20 years) No framework agreement: Direct procurement Evaluation: Price (60%), Quality (40%) Status: Cancelled No EU funding Key Procurement Details Detail Information Contracting authority Keski-Uudenmaan hyvinvointialue (Keusote) Contract title Hyvinkään ikääntyneiden asumispalveluyksikkö - rakennettavan vuokratilan hankinta Main CPV 45000000 Construction work Additional CPV 70310000 Building rental or sale services Procedure type Open procedure (standard regime) Legal basis EU Directive 2014/24/EU; Finnish Procurement Act Estimated value (EUR) €16,000,000.00 Number of lots 1 Contract duration 240 months (20 years) EU funding None Covered by GPA Yes Evaluation criteria Price (60%), Quality (40%) Location Hyvinkää, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Status Cancelled – technical/procedural errors Number of tenders 3 (all from medium-sized enterprises) Accessibility criteria Included for persons with disabilities Project Scope – Elderly Housing Services Unit Capacity: 60 places total 20 places for 24/7 care 40 places for communal living Building: 1-4 storeys Units: Three units for elderly housing services Delivery: "Avaimet käteen" (turnkey) principle Funding: Keusote has borrowing authority of €16M (2024) Land: Land plot to be acquired during the procurement process Key Features Long-term lease: 20-year lease agreement Turnkey delivery: Facilities delivered in ready-to-use condition Cost responsibility: Keusote does not participate in construction costs Accessibility: Facilities must be safe, efficient, and sensory-friendly Single supplier: One landlord selected to implement and lease the facility Procurement Procedure The procedure followed the Finnish Procurement Act (1397/2016) with the following steps: Publication of procurement notice and tender documents Questions and answers Tender submission by deadline Tender opening Possible clarifications from bidders Assessment of suitability Verification of compliance with tender requirements Tender comparison Clarification negotiations Procurement decision Evaluation Criteria The contract was to be awarded based on two criteria: Price (60%): Overall cost of the lease Quality (40%): Quality of the proposed solution and facilities Procurement Outcome – Cancellation Reason for cancellation: Technical or procedural errors Cancellation date: 10 June 2026 Decision maker: Keusote's Group Division (konsernijaosto) Tenders received: 3 (all from medium-sized enterprises) Status: No winner chosen, competition closed About the Contracting Authority Keski-Uudenmaan hyvinvointialue (Keusote) is the wellbeing services county for Central Uusimaa, Finland. The authority is responsible for organising social welfare and healthcare services for residents in the region, including services for older adults. Procurement Analysis Procedure: Open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Competition: Three tenders were received from medium-sized enterprises. Status: Cancelled due to technical or procedural errors. SME participation: All three bidders were medium-sized enterprises. No EU funding: The procurement was not financed with EU funds. No framework agreement: This was a direct procurement. No dynamic purchasing system used. Accelerated procedure: No. Accessibility criteria: Included for persons with disabilities. Review body: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Additional Procurement Facts The procurement was covered by the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). No EU funds were used for this procurement. The contract had an estimated value of €16,000,000. The duration was 240 months (20 years). Three tenders were received from medium-sized enterprises. The procurement was cancelled on 10 June 2026. The reason for cancellation was technical or procedural errors. Accessibility criteria for persons with disabilities were included. Two supplementary letters were issued during the process. Schedule changes were made on 2 February 2026. Contract terms were clarified on 6 March 2026. No winner was chosen. Market & Industry Perspective The Finnish elderly housing services market is growing due to demographic changes and an ageing population. Municipalities and wellbeing services counties are increasingly procuring built-to-rent facilities through long-term lease agreements. Key trends in this market include: Demographic change: Increasing demand for elderly housing services Public-private cooperation: Turnkey delivery models Long-term leases: 20-year lease agreements provide stability Quality focus: 40% weighting on quality Accessibility: Growing emphasis on accessible and sensory-friendly facilities Economic Significance At €16 million, this procurement represented a significant investment in elderly housing infrastructure in Hyvinkää. The cancellation means that: Project delayed: Elderly housing services will not be delivered as planned Market impact: Three medium-sized enterprises invested time in tendering Future re-tender: Likely new procurement process to follow Funding available: Keusote has €16M borrowing authority Future Procurement Opportunities Following the cancellation, future opportunities include: Re-tender: Keusote is likely to re-tender the procurement Related services: Other elderly housing services in the region Other wellbeing services counties: Similar procurements in other Finnish regions Subcontracting: Potential opportunities with future winners Opportunities for Suppliers Following the cancellation, opportunities remain for construction and property development companies: Re-tender: Prepare for a potential re-tender Other Finnish regions: Similar elderly housing procurements Subcontracting: Potential opportunities with future winners Related services: Property management and maintenance What Businesses Should Watch Keusote's future procurement notices Other Finnish wellbeing services county tenders Elderly housing services market trends Changes to Finnish procurement regulations Demographic developments in the Hyvinkää region FinlandTenders Procurement Intelligence This cancelled procurement is a notable example of Finnish wellbeing services procurement. Several features stand out: Scale: €16 million over 20 years Cancellation: Technical or procedural errors Price focus: 60% weighting on price SME participation: All three bidders were medium-sized Accessibility: Criteria for persons with disabilities included Turnkey: "Avaimet käteen" delivery model For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of: Competitive pricing: Price accounts for 60% of evaluation Quality demonstration: Quality accounts for 40% Procurement compliance: Ensuring technical and procedural compliance Long-term commitment: Ability to deliver 20-year projects Accessibility expertise: Knowledge of accessibility requirements Supplier Takeaways Offer competitive pricing – 60% of evaluation is price-based Demonstrate quality – 40% weighting Ensure technical and procedural compliance Be prepared for long-term (20-year) commitments Develop accessibility expertise Monitor Keusote and Finnish wellbeing services county procurement opportunities Key Takeaways Keusote cancelled a €16M elderly housing procurement Reason: Technical or procedural errors Cancellation date: 10 June 2026 Three tenders received from medium-sized enterprises Duration: 240 months (20 years) Evaluation: Price (60%), Quality (40%) Accessibility criteria included No winner chosen, competition closed Conclusion This elderly housing services procurement represents a significant cancelled tender in the Finnish wellbeing services sector. Despite the estimated €16 million value and 20-year lease term, the procurement was cancelled on 10 June 2026 due to technical or procedural errors. The 60% weighting on price and 40% on quality reflects the importance of both cost-effectiveness and facility quality in elderly housing services. The inclusion of accessibility criteria for persons with disabilities demonstrates the commitment to inclusive design. For suppliers, this cancelled tender highlights the importance of technical and procedural compliance, competitive pricing, and quality demonstration in winning Finnish wellbeing services county procurements. A re-tender is likely in the future. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is Keusote? Ans: Keski-Uudenmaan hyvinvointialue – the wellbeing services county for Central Uusimaa, Finland, responsible for organising social welfare and healthcare services. Q: What was the value of the procurement? Ans: €16,000,000 estimated value. Q: Why was the procurement cancelled? Ans: Technical or procedural errors. Q: When was the procurement cancelled? Ans: 10 June 2026. Q: How many tenders were received? Ans: Three tenders were received, all from medium-sized enterprises. Q: What was being procured? Ans: A built-to-rent elderly housing services unit in Hyvinkää with 60 places (20 for 24/7 care, 40 for communal living). Q: What were the evaluation criteria? Ans: Price (60%) and Quality (40%). Q: How long was the contract intended to run? Ans: 240 months (20 years). Q: Were accessibility criteria included? Ans: Yes, accessibility criteria for persons with disabilities were included. Q: What is the review body? Ans: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Source: EU Official Journal, Contract Award Notice 597112-2026, OJ S 167/2026, published 31 August 2026. body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 20px; } table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 15px 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; } th { background-color: #f2f2f2; } ul { padding-left: 20px; } h2 { margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; }
View Details
Helsinki City Awards €2M Speech Therapy and Psychology Framework to Multiple Winners
28 Aug 2026
The City of Helsinki's Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division (SOTEPE) has awarded a framework agreement for children and young people's speech therapy, psychology, and neuropsychological services. The framework has a maximum value of €2 million and is divided into 10 sub-areas covering Finnish and Swedish language services. Multiple service providers were selected, including Pihlajalinna Lääkärikeskukset Oy, Mehiläinen Oy, Suomen Terveystalo Oy, and numerous specialist practitioners. Introduction The City of Helsinki's Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division (Sosiaali-, terveys- ja pelastustoimiala – SOTEPE) has conducted an open procedure for the procurement of speech therapy, psychology, and neuropsychological services for children and young people. The procurement is divided into 10 sub-areas covering Finnish and Swedish language services in speech therapy assessments and rehabilitation, psychology services, and neuropsychological assessments and rehabilitation. The framework has a maximum value of €2 million and runs for an initial two-year period (1 November 2026 – 31 October 2028), with two optional 12-month extensions. The contracting authority does not commit to specific procurement volumes but purchases services based on client needs. Multiple service providers were selected across the 10 lots, including major healthcare companies (Pihlajalinna, Mehiläinen, Terveystalo) and numerous specialist practitioners. The evaluation was 100% price-based, with quality ensured through high minimum requirements set in the tender documents. Why This Contract Matters This contract ensures that children and young people in Helsinki have access to essential speech therapy, psychology, and neuropsychological services in both Finnish and Swedish. This contract matters because it: Supports children's health: Provides essential therapeutic services Significant value: €2,000,000 framework Long-term commitment: Up to 4 years (2 years + 2 x 12-month extensions) Comprehensive scope: 10 sub-areas covering Finnish and Swedish services Multi-provider: Numerous service providers selected Flexible allocation: Priority order system with exceptions for client needs Price focus: 100% price-based evaluation Contract Timeline Previous notice: 1efea20b-03c2-425b-b751-5db3f28e5928-01 Winner chosen: 25 May 2026 Contracts concluded: 16 June – 18 August 2026 Contract start date: 1 November 2026 Contract end date: 31 October 2028 Initial duration: 2 years Maximum renewals: 2 (12 months each) Maximum total duration: 48 months Notice published: 28 August 2026 (OJ S 166/2026) Contract Overview The City of Helsinki conducted an open procedure under the light regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Key features include: 10 sub-areas: Speech therapy assessment (Finnish/Swedish), Speech therapy rehabilitation (Finnish/Swedish), Psychology services (Finnish/Swedish), Neuropsychological assessment (Finnish/Swedish), Neuropsychological rehabilitation (Finnish/Swedish) Total maximum value: €2,000,000 Duration: 2 years initial + 2 x 12-month extensions (max 4 years) Framework type: Without reopening of competition Evaluation: Price (100%) Winners: Multiple providers including Pihlajalinna, Mehiläinen, Terveystalo, and numerous specialist practitioners Subcontracting: Varies by provider No EU funding Key Contract Details Detail Information Contracting authority Helsingin kaupungin sosiaali-, terveys- ja pelastustoimiala (SOTEPE) Contract title Lasten ja nuorten puheterapia, psykologipalvelut ja neuropsykologipalvelut Main CPV 85000000 Health and social work services Additional CPV 85121270 Psychiatrist or psychologist services Procedure type Open procedure (light regime) Legal basis EU Directive 2014/24/EU; Finnish Procurement Act Total maximum value (EUR) €2,000,000.00 Number of lots 10 Initial duration 2 years (1 November 2026 – 31 October 2028) Maximum renewals 2 (12 months each) Maximum total duration 48 months EU funding None Covered by GPA Yes Evaluation criteria Price (100%) Location Helsinki-Uusimaa, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Subcontracting Varies by provider Service Areas (Lots) Lot Title Language Service Type Max Value (€) Winners Tenders 1 Speech therapy assessment Finnish Assessment 200,000 Pragma Terapia, Puheterapia OraCom, Äänneloikka, Terveystalo, HLS-Fondo, Puheklinikka NET, Ab Puhepoint, Bellafonia, ProNeuron, Puhetuuli, Mehiläinen, Coronaria Contextia, Aarresanat, Sofita 16 2 Speech therapy assessment Swedish Assessment 200,000 Äänneloikka, HLS-Fondo, ProNeuron, Mehiläinen, Coronaria Contextia, Folkhälsan Välfärd 7 3 Psychology services Finnish Psychology 200,000 Pihlajalinna, KKT-keskus, Sofita, Mehiläinen, Terveystalo, Silmuke, Saraste terveys, Tmi Jenni Heikkilä, Neuropsykologi Kaisa Kanerva, Coronaria Contextia, NepsyFocus, ProNeuron 13 4 Psychology services Swedish Psychology 200,000 Pihlajalinna, Sofita, Mehiläinen, NepsyFocus, Folkhälsan Välfärd 7 5 Neuropsychological assessment Finnish Assessment 200,000 Pihlajalinna, Silmuke, Sofita, Terveystalo, Saraste terveys, NepsyFocus, Mehiläinen, Coronaria Contextia, ProNeuron, Neuropsykologi Kaisa Kanerva, Tmi Tuire Kangas, Tmi Jenni Heikkilä, Neuropsykologinen tutkimus ja kuntoutus Minna Poutanen, Neuropsykologi Elina Hankomäki 15 6 Neuropsychological assessment Swedish Assessment 200,000 Pihlajalinna, NepsyFocus, Sofita, Folkhälsan Välfärd 5 7 Speech therapy rehabilitation Finnish Rehabilitation 200,000 Puheterapia OraCom, Terveystalo, Äänneloikka, Aarresanat, Mehiläinen, HLS-Fondo, Pragma Terapia, ProNeuron, Coronaria Contextia, Puheklinikka NET, Folkhälsan Välfärd, Puhetuuli, Ab Puhepoint, Bellafonia, Speech Training Finland, Sofita 17 8 Speech therapy rehabilitation Swedish Rehabilitation 200,000 Äänneloikka, HLS-Fondo, ProNeuron, Mehiläinen, Coronaria Contextia, Folkhälsan Välfärd, Bellafonia 8 9 Neuropsychological rehabilitation Finnish Rehabilitation 200,000 Pihlajalinna, Mayet, Neuropsykologi Kaisa Kanerva, Saraste terveys, NepsyFocus, Sofita, Silmuke, ProNeuron, Mehiläinen, Tmi Tuire Kangas, Neuropsykologinen tutkimus ja kuntoutus Minna Poutanen, Coronaria Contextia, Terveystalo, Neuropsykologi Elina Hankomäki, Tmi Jenni Heikkilä 16 10 Neuropsychological rehabilitation Swedish Rehabilitation 200,000 Pihlajalinna, NepsyFocus, Sofita 4 Framework Allocation – Priority Order System The framework uses a priority order system for allocating assignments: Priority order: Service providers are placed in priority order based on the most economically advantageous tender Default allocation: Orders are made from the first priority provider Next provider: If the first provider cannot offer an appointment within a reasonable time, the next provider is approached Exceptions: The priority order can be bypassed due to client-specific needs (choosing the provider that best meets the client's needs) or in emergency situations (choosing the provider that can offer the fastest appointment) About the Contracting Authority Helsingin kaupungin sosiaali-, terveys- ja pelastustoimiala (SOTEPE) is the City of Helsinki's Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division. The division is responsible for providing social welfare, healthcare, and rescue services to Helsinki residents, including services for children and young people. About the Major Winners Pihlajalinna Lääkärikeskukset Oy Size: Large enterprise Headquarters: Tampere, Finland Lots won: 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 Specialisation: Healthcare services Subcontracting: No Mehiläinen Oy Size: Large enterprise Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland Lots won: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 Specialisation: Healthcare services Subcontracting: Yes (varies by lot) Suomen Terveystalo Oy Size: Large enterprise Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland Lots won: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 Specialisation: Healthcare services Subcontracting: Yes (varies by lot) Äänneloikka Oy Size: SME Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland Lots won: 1, 2, 7, 8 Specialisation: Speech therapy Subcontracting: Yes Etac A/S (Coronaria Contextia Oy) Size: SME Headquarters: Oulu, Finland Lots won: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 Specialisation: Healthcare and therapy services Subcontracting: Yes Winners Summary Supplier Lots Won Type Pihlajalinna Lääkärikeskukset Oy 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 Large Mehiläinen Oy 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 Large Suomen Terveystalo Oy 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 Large Äänneloikka Oy 1, 2, 7, 8 SME Coronaria Contextia Oy 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 SME Sofita Oy 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 SME HLS-Fondo Oy 1, 2, 7, 8 SME NepsyFocus Oy 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 SME ProNeuron Oy 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 SME Folkhälsan Välfärd Ab 2, 4, 6, 7, 8 Large Pragma Terapia Oy 1, 7 SME Puheterapia OraCom Oy 1, 7 SME Saraste terveys Oy 3, 5, 9 SME Silmuke Oy 3, 5, 9 SME Neuropsykologi Kaisa Kanerva 3, 5, 9 SME And many other specialist practitioners Various SME Evaluation Criteria The contract was awarded based on a single criterion: Price (100%): The most economically advantageous tender, with quality ensured through high minimum requirements set in the tender documents Procurement Analysis Procedure: Open procedure under the light regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Competition: Strong competition across all lots (4-17 tenders per lot). SME participation: Significant SME participation across all lots, with numerous specialist practitioners. Subcontracting: Varies by provider – some use subcontracting, others do not. No EU funding: The procurement was not financed with EU funds. No framework agreement with reopening: The framework is without reopening of competition. No dynamic purchasing system used. Light regime: The procurement is subject to the light regime. Review body: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Additional Procurement Facts The contract is covered by the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). No EU funds were used for this procurement. The framework has a total maximum value of €2,000,000. The framework is divided into 10 sub-areas. The evaluation is 100% price-based. Quality is ensured through high minimum requirements in the tender documents. All lots have a maximum value of €200,000 each. Lot 7 (Speech therapy rehabilitation Finnish) had the most tenders (17). Lot 10 (Neuropsychological rehabilitation Swedish) had the fewest tenders (4). The priority order system ensures efficient allocation of assignments. Exceptions allow for client-specific needs and emergency situations. Market & Industry Perspective The Finnish healthcare services market is competitive, with both large healthcare companies and numerous specialist practitioners. The City of Helsinki, as Finland's largest city, procures significant volumes of health services for its residents. Key trends in this market include: Children's health focus: Strong investment in child and youth health services Bilingual services: Finnish and Swedish language services Price competition: 100% price-based evaluation SME participation: Numerous specialist practitioners Long-term frameworks: Up to 4 years with extension options Economic Significance At €2 million, this framework represents a significant investment in children's health services in Helsinki. The contract will: Support children's health: Provide essential therapeutic services Enable bilingual services: Finnish and Swedish language options Support SMEs: Numerous specialist practitioners selected Provide long-term stability: Up to 4-year framework Ensure quality: High minimum requirements Future Procurement Opportunities With this framework now in place, future opportunities include: Re-tender: Expected after the 4-year maximum duration Related services: Additional health and social services Other Finnish cities: Similar health service procurements Specialist services: New therapeutic approaches Opportunities for Suppliers While this contract is awarded, opportunities remain for healthcare providers: Re-tender: Prepare for the next procurement cycle Related services: Other health and social services in Helsinki Other Finnish cities: Similar procurement opportunities Subcontracting: Potential opportunities with the winners What Businesses Should Watch Helsinki City's future procurement notices Other Finnish municipal health service tenders Children's health service developments Changes to Finnish procurement regulations FinlandTenders Procurement Intelligence This health services framework is a notable example of Finnish municipal health procurement. Several features stand out: Scale: €2 million across 10 lots Price focus: 100% price-based evaluation Bilingual: Finnish and Swedish language services Multi-provider: Numerous providers selected Priority order: Structured allocation system SME participation: Strong presence of specialist practitioners For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of: Competitive pricing: 100% price-based evaluation Quality compliance: Meeting high minimum requirements Language capability: Finnish and Swedish language services Specialist expertise: Speech therapy, psychology, neuropsychology Capacity: Ability to serve clients in a priority order system Supplier Takeaways Offer competitive pricing – 100% of evaluation is price-based Meet high quality minimum requirements Develop bilingual service capability (Finnish and Swedish) Build specialist expertise in speech therapy, psychology, and neuropsychology Ensure capacity to serve clients under priority order system Monitor Helsinki City and other Finnish municipal health procurements Key Takeaways Helsinki City awarded a €2M health services framework 10 lots covering speech therapy, psychology, and neuropsychological services Multiple winners including Pihlajalinna, Mehiläinen, Terveystalo, and numerous specialist practitioners Duration: 2 years + 2 x 12-month extensions (max 4 years) Evaluation: Price (100%) 4-17 tenders per lot Priority order system for assignment allocation Bilingual services (Finnish and Swedish) Conclusion This speech therapy, psychology, and neuropsychological services framework ensures that children and young people in Helsinki have access to essential therapeutic services in both Finnish and Swedish. By selecting multiple providers across 10 sub-areas, the City of Helsinki ensures service availability, choice, and competitive pricing. The 100% price-based evaluation reflects the importance of cost-effectiveness in municipal health procurement, while the high minimum quality requirements ensure that service quality is maintained. The priority order system provides an efficient allocation mechanism while allowing flexibility for client-specific needs and emergency situations. For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of competitive pricing, quality compliance, and bilingual service capability in winning Finnish municipal health service contracts. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is SOTEPE? Ans: The City of Helsinki's Social Services, Health Care and Rescue Services Division (sosiaali-, terveys- ja pelastustoimiala). Q: What is the value of the framework? Ans: €2,000,000 across all lots. Q: Who are the major winners? Ans: Pihlajalinna Lääkärikeskukset Oy, Mehiläinen Oy, Suomen Terveystalo Oy, Äänneloikka Oy, Coronaria Contextia Oy, Sofita Oy, and numerous specialist practitioners. Q: What services are covered? Ans: Speech therapy assessments and rehabilitation, psychology services, and neuropsychological assessments and rehabilitation for children and young people. Q: What were the evaluation criteria? Ans: Price (100%), with quality ensured through high minimum requirements. Q: How long is the contract? Ans: 2 years initial, with 2 x 12-month extension options (maximum 4 years). Q: How many lots are there? Ans: 10 sub-areas. Q: Is this contract funded by the EU? Ans: No, the procurement is not financed with EU funds. Q: What is the review body? Ans: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Q: What languages are supported? Ans: Finnish and Swedish. Source: EU Official Journal, Contract Award Notice 594738-2026, OJ S 166/2026, published 28 August 2026. body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 20px; } table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 15px 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; } th { background-color: #f2f2f2; } ul { padding-left: 20px; } h2 { margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; }
View Details
DVV Awards €3.6M Project Management Framework to KPMG and CGI
27 Aug 2026
The Digital and Population Data Services Agency (Digi- ja väestötietovirasto – DVV) has awarded a framework agreement for project and programme management expert services to two suppliers: KPMG Oy Ab (ranked 1st) and CGI Suomi Oy (ranked 2nd). The €3.6 million framework covers project management, coordination, steering, and reporting support for DVV's projects and programmes, as well as complementary domain expert services. The framework runs until 31 December 2030, with up to two additional one-year extension options. Introduction The Digital and Population Data Services Agency (Digi- ja väestötietovirasto – DVV) has conducted an open procedure for the establishment of a framework agreement for project and programme management expert services. The procurement covers expert services to support DVV's projects and programmes, including project management, coordination, steering, and reporting, in accordance with DVV's operating models and in close cooperation with DVV representatives. The framework also includes complementary domain expert services related to DVV's field of activity. Technical expert roles such as Scrum Master, developer, coder, architect, or other IT implementation-focused roles are explicitly excluded from the scope. The framework has an estimated value of €3.6 million and runs until 31 December 2030, with up to two additional one-year extension options. Two suppliers were selected: KPMG Oy Ab (ranked 1st) and CGI Suomi Oy (ranked 2nd). Why This Contract Matters This contract ensures that DVV has access to expert project and programme management support to deliver its digital and population data services effectively. This contract matters because it: Supports public services: Enhances DVV's project delivery capability Significant value: €3,600,000 framework Long-term commitment: Up to 6.5 years (78 months + extensions) Two suppliers: KPMG and CGI selected Non-technical focus: Excludes IT implementation roles Quality and price balance: 50% price, 50% quality Strong competition: 15 tenders received Contract Timeline Previous notice: 82d5c358-33e8-4666-839f-8a772bd01327-01 Winner chosen: 3 June 2026 KPMG contract concluded: 10 August 2026 CGI contract concluded: 29 June 2026 Contract start: Upon signing Contract end: 31 December 2030 Extension options: Up to 2 x 1-year extensions Maximum total duration: Until 31 December 2032 Notice published: 27 August 2026 (OJ S 165/2026) Contract Overview DVV conducted an open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Key features include: Single lot: One framework covering all project and programme management services Estimated value: €3,600,000 Maximum framework value: €3,600,000 Duration: Until 31 December 2030 (approx. 4.5 years) Extension options: Up to 2 x 1-year extensions (max 6.5 years) Framework type: Partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition Evaluation: Price (50%), Quality (50%) Winners: KPMG Oy Ab (rank 1), CGI Suomi Oy (rank 2) Subcontracting: Not yet known No EU funding Key Contract Details Detail Information Contracting authority Digi- ja väestötietovirasto (DVV) – Digital and Population Data Services Agency Contract title Projekti- ja hankehallinnan asiantuntijapalveluiden puitejärjestely Main CPV 79400000 Business and management consultancy and related services Additional CPVs 72224000, 73000000, 79421000, 79421200 Procedure type Open procedure (standard regime) Legal basis EU Directive 2014/24/EU; Finnish Procurement Act Estimated value (EUR) €3,600,000.00 Maximum value (EUR) €3,600,000.00 Number of lots 1 Contract duration Until 31 December 2030 (approx. 4.5 years) Maximum renewals 2 (1 year each) Maximum total duration Until 31 December 2032 (approx. 6.5 years) EU funding None Covered by GPA Yes Evaluation criteria Price (50%), Quality (50%) Location Anywhere in the European Economic Area Subcontracting Not yet known Number of tenders 15 Strategic procurement Fair working conditions Scope of Services The framework covers project and programme management expert services for DVV, including: Project and programme management: Planning, coordination, steering, and reporting Complementary domain expert services: Related to DVV's field of activity Collaboration: Close cooperation with DVV representatives Flexibility: Quick access to competent support when needed Excluded Services The following technical expert roles are explicitly excluded from the scope: Scrum Master Developer Programmer / Coder Architect Other IT implementation-focused expert roles Framework Structure The framework is established under the Finnish Procurement Act (sections 42-43) and operates as follows: Type: Framework agreement, partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition Suppliers: Two suppliers selected (KPMG and CGI) Operation: Described in the framework agreement draft attached to the tender documents Evaluation Criteria The contract was awarded based on four criteria with the following weightings: Price (50%) Lowest comparison price: Prices are compared based on expert role prices and weightings in Appendix 4 (Price Form) Quality (50%) – Three Sub-Criteria Expert capacity (30%): Role-specific expert capacity indicated in the service description (scored 0-20 based on index value scoring, plus 0-10 for realism of resource capacity) Expert resource availability and delivery reliability (10%): Responses/descriptions evaluated and scored (0-10) Competence and quality management during the contract period (10%): Responses/descriptions evaluated and scored (0-10) Strategic Procurement – Fair Working Conditions The procurement includes a social objective: Social objective promoted: Fair working conditions Significance: Reflects the importance of labour rights and fair employment practices in Finnish public procurement About the Contracting Authority Digi- ja väestötietovirasto (DVV) – the Digital and Population Data Services Agency – is a Finnish central government authority responsible for digital services and population data. DVV's functions include population registration, digital identity services, and various digital government services. About the Winners 1. KPMG Oy Ab Size: Medium enterprise Headquarters: Töölönlahdenkatu 3 A, Helsinki, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 1805485-9 Specialisation: Audit, tax, advisory, and consulting services Rank: 1st Contract concluded: 10 August 2026 Subcontracting: Not yet known 2. CGI Suomi Oy Size: Medium enterprise Headquarters: PL 64, Helsinki, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 0357502-9 Specialisation: IT and business consulting services Rank: 2nd Contract concluded: 29 June 2026 Subcontracting: Not yet known Winners Summary Supplier Size Location Rank Contract Concluded KPMG Oy Ab Medium Helsinki (FI1B1) 1 10 August 2026 CGI Suomi Oy Medium Helsinki (FI1B1) 2 29 June 2026 Procurement Analysis Procedure: Open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Competition: Strong competition with 15 tenders received. SME participation: Both winners are medium-sized enterprises. Subcontracting: Not yet known for either winner. No EU funding: The procurement was not financed with EU funds. No framework agreement with full reopening: The framework is partly without reopening and partly with reopening of competition. No dynamic purchasing system used. Accelerated procedure: No. Strategic procurement: Includes fair working conditions as a social objective. Review body: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Appeal deadlines: 14 days for procurement review requests and appeals to the Market Court. Additional Procurement Facts The contract is covered by the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). No EU funds were used for this procurement. The framework has a maximum value of €3,600,000. The contract duration is until 31 December 2030 (approx. 4.5 years). Two extension options of 1 year each are available. Technical IT implementation roles are explicitly excluded. Two suppliers were selected: KPMG (rank 1) and CGI (rank 2). Quality accounts for 50% of the evaluation. Price accounts for 50% of the evaluation. Strategic social objective: Fair working conditions. 15 tenders were received, indicating strong competition. Both winners are medium-sized Finnish companies. Market & Industry Perspective The Finnish public sector consulting market is competitive, with both large international consultancies and domestic firms competing for contracts. DVV, as a central government authority, requires expert support for its project and programme management functions. Key trends in this market include: Digital transformation: Growing demand for project management support Quality focus: Strong emphasis on expert capacity and competence management Social responsibility: Growing importance of fair working conditions Long-term frameworks: Up to 6.5 years provides stability Competitive bidding: 15 tenders for 2 positions Economic Significance At €3.6 million, this framework represents a significant investment in project management expertise for DVV. The contract will: Support project delivery: Enhance DVV's project and programme capabilities Enable digital services: Support DVV's digital transformation Provide long-term stability: Up to 6.5-year framework Support Finnish consultancies: Both winners are Finnish medium-sized enterprises Ensure quality: Strong weighting on quality and expert capacity Future Procurement Opportunities With this framework now in place, future opportunities include: Re-tender: Expected after the framework expires (2030-2032) Related services: Additional consulting and advisory services Subcontracting: Potential opportunities with KPMG and CGI Other Finnish authorities: Similar project management frameworks Opportunities for Suppliers While this contract is awarded, opportunities remain for management consultants: Re-tender: Prepare for the next procurement cycle Subcontracting: Potential opportunities with KPMG or CGI Other Finnish authorities: Similar project management tenders Related services: Specialised consulting services What Businesses Should Watch DVV's future procurement notices Other Finnish government project management tenders Changes to Finnish procurement regulations Fair working conditions requirements Digital and population data services trends FinlandTenders Procurement Intelligence This project management framework is a notable example of Finnish public sector consulting procurement. Several features stand out: Scale: €3.6 million over up to 6.5 years Competition: 15 tenders for 2 positions Quality focus: 50% weighting on quality Two suppliers: KPMG and CGI selected Non-technical scope: IT implementation roles excluded Strategic: Fair working conditions included For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of: Expert capacity: Strong emphasis on available expert resources Quality management: Competence and quality management during contract period Competitive pricing: Price accounts for 50% Delivery reliability: Resource availability and delivery reliability Social responsibility: Fair working conditions Supplier Takeaways Demonstrate strong expert capacity – 30% weighting Show resource availability and delivery reliability – 10% weighting Demonstrate competence and quality management – 10% weighting Offer competitive pricing – 50% weighting Ensure fair working conditions compliance Monitor Finnish public sector consulting opportunities Key Takeaways DVV awarded a €3.6M project management framework to KPMG and CGI Single lot covering project and programme management expert services Duration: Until 31 December 2030 + up to 2 x 1-year extensions Evaluation: Price (50%), Quality (50%) 15 tenders received – strong competition Winners: KPMG (rank 1), CGI (rank 2) IT implementation roles excluded from scope Strategic objective: Fair working conditions Conclusion This project and programme management framework ensures that DVV has access to expert consulting support for its projects and programmes over the coming years. By awarding contracts to KPMG and CGI, DVV secures two qualified suppliers with strong capabilities in project management and advisory services. The 50% weighting on quality—including expert capacity, resource availability, and competence management—reflects the importance of having reliable and competent experts available to support DVV's operations. The explicit exclusion of technical IT implementation roles clearly delineates the scope of this procurement. The inclusion of fair working conditions as a strategic objective reflects the growing importance of social responsibility in Finnish public procurement. For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of expert capacity, competitive pricing, and social responsibility in winning Finnish public sector consulting contracts. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is DVV? Ans: Digi- ja väestötietovirasto – the Digital and Population Data Services Agency, a Finnish central government authority responsible for digital services and population data. Q: What is the value of the framework? Ans: €3,600,000. Q: Who are the winners? Ans: KPMG Oy Ab (rank 1) and CGI Suomi Oy (rank 2). Q: What services are covered? Ans: Project and programme management expert services, including planning, coordination, steering, and reporting, plus complementary domain expert services. Technical IT implementation roles are excluded. Q: What were the evaluation criteria? Ans: Price (50%), Expert capacity (30%), Resource availability and delivery reliability (10%), Competence and quality management (10%). Q: How long is the contract? Ans: Until 31 December 2030, with up to 2 x 1-year extension options. Q: How many tenders were received? Ans: 15 tenders were received. Q: Is this contract funded by the EU? Ans: No, the procurement is not financed with EU funds. Q: What is the review body? Ans: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Q: What strategic objective is included? Ans: Fair working conditions. Source: EU Official Journal, Contract Award Notice 591029-2026, OJ S 165/2026, published 27 August 2026. body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 20px; } table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 15px 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; } th { background-color: #f2f2f2; } ul { padding-left: 20px; } h2 { margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; }
View Details