Kirkkonummi Municipality Awards €12M Urban Development Design Framework to Sweco, FCG, and Destia
26 Aug 2026
Kirkkonummi Municipality has awarded a framework agreement for urban development design services to three winners: Sweco Finland Oy, FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy, and Destia Oy Asiantuntijapalvelut. The €12 million framework covers architectural, construction, engineering, and inspection services for the municipality's urban development sector, with a duration of three years (1 May 2026 – 30 April 2029). Introduction Kirkkonummi Municipality, located in the Helsinki-Uusimaa region of Finland, has conducted an open procedure for a framework agreement covering urban development design services. The procurement covers design services for the municipality's urban development sector, as specified in the tender documents and appendices. The framework has a maximum value of €12 million and runs for three years (1 May 2026 to 30 April 2029). The framework uses a priority order system, with the contracting authority reserving the right to reject all tenders or conduct separate competitive tendering for specific projects. Three winners were selected: Sweco Finland Oy (large), FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy (medium), and Destia Oy Asiantuntijapalvelut (large). All three winners have declared subcontracting (value and percentage not known). The procurement is not covered by the GPA and is not financed with EU funds. Why This Contract Matters This contract ensures that Kirkkonummi Municipality has access to high-quality urban development design services for its growing community in the Helsinki metropolitan area. This contract matters because it: Supports urban development: Design services for municipal development projects Significant value: €12,000,000 framework Long-term commitment: 3-year framework agreement Multi-supplier: Three qualified suppliers selected Priority order: Structured allocation of assignments Price focus: 70% weighting on price Strong competition: Six tenders received Contract Timeline Previous notice: 50656027-4f47-48ac-9dbe-a113e2384690-01 Winner chosen: 6 May 2026 Contract concluded: 19 August 2026 Contract start date: 1 May 2026 Contract end date: 30 April 2029 Duration: 3 years Notice published: 26 August 2026 (OJ S 164/2026) Contract Overview Kirkkonummi Municipality conducted an open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Key features include: Single lot: One framework covering all urban development design services Maximum value: €12,000,000 Duration: 3 years (1 May 2026 – 30 April 2029) Framework type: Without reopening of competition, with priority order system Evaluation: Price (70%), Quality (30%) Winners: Sweco Finland Oy, FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy, Destia Oy Asiantuntijapalvelut Subcontracting: All winners declared subcontracting (value/percentage not known) No EU funding Not covered by GPA Key Contract Details Detail Information Contracting authority Kirkkonummen kunta (Kirkkonummi Municipality) Contract title Kirkkonummen kunnan kuntakehityksen suunnittelutehtäviä koskeva puitejärjestely Main CPV 71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services Procedure type Open procedure (standard regime) Legal basis EU Directive 2014/24/EU; Finnish Procurement Act Maximum value (EUR) €12,000,000.00 Number of lots 1 Contract duration 3 years (1 May 2026 – 30 April 2029) EU funding None Covered by GPA No Evaluation criteria Price (70%), Quality (30%) Location Kirkkonummi, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Subcontracting Yes (all winners; value/percentage not known) Number of tenders 6 (all submitted electronically) Scope of Services The framework covers urban development design services for Kirkkonummi Municipality, including: Architectural services: Building and urban design Construction services: Construction planning and design Engineering services: Technical engineering and design Inspection services: Quality control and inspection The specific services are detailed in Appendix 2 of the tender documents (Hankittavan palvelun kuvaus). Framework Structure – Priority Order The framework uses a priority order system for allocating assignments: Priority order: Assignments are allocated based on a pre-defined order among framework partners Detailed description: The priority system is described in Appendix 2 Contracting authority rights: The municipality reserves the right to: Reject all tenders for any project Conduct public competitive tendering for specific projects Follow the municipality's own procurement guidelines No obligation: The municipality is not obligated to use the framework for all procurements Evaluation Criteria The contract was awarded based on two main criteria: Price (70%) Evaluated based on a comparison price calculated from seven personnel group components with different weightings: h1 - Group E: Leading experts/specialists (×10) h2 - Group 02: Senior consultants/architects (×25) h3 - Group 03: Consultants/experienced architects (×25) h4 - Group 04: Designers/office architects (×22) h5 - Group 05: Junior designers (×15) h6 - Group 06: Design assistants/technical assistants (×2) h7 - Group 07: Assistants and trainees (×1) The bidder with the lowest comparison price receives 70.00 points. Others receive points using the formula: 70.00 × lowest comparison price / offered comparison price. Quality (30%) Quality is evaluated based on four sub-criteria (L1-L4), as detailed in the procurement documents. The bidder receiving the highest combined quality score receives 30.00 points. Others receive points using the formula: 30.00 × bidder's quality score / highest quality score. About the Contracting Authority Kirkkonummen kunta (Kirkkonummi Municipality) is a local authority in the Helsinki-Uusimaa region of Finland. The municipality is located on the southern coast of Finland, west of Helsinki. The urban development sector is responsible for planning and development projects across the municipality. About the Winners 1. Sweco Finland Oy Size: Large enterprise Headquarters: Ilmalantori 4, Helsinki, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 2661738-3 Specialisation: Engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting Part of: Sweco Group, Europe's largest engineering consultancy Subcontracting: Yes (value/percentage not known) 2. FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy Size: Medium enterprise Headquarters: Osmontie 34, Helsinki, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 3485116-1 Specialisation: Built environment consulting and design Subcontracting: Yes (value/percentage not known) 3. Destia Oy Asiantuntijapalvelut Size: Large enterprise Headquarters: Firdonkatu 2 T 151, Helsinki, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 2163026-3 Specialisation: Infrastructure and expert services Subcontracting: Yes (value/percentage not known) Procurement Analysis Procedure: Open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act. Competition: Six tenders were received, all submitted electronically. SME participation: One medium-sized winner (FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy) and two large enterprises. Subcontracting: All three winners declared subcontracting (value and percentage not disclosed). No EU funding: The procurement is not financed with EU funds. Not covered by GPA: The procurement is not covered by the Government Procurement Agreement. No framework agreement with reopening: The framework is without reopening of competition. No dynamic purchasing system used. Accelerated procedure: No. Priority order system: Framework uses a priority order for allocating assignments. Review body: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Additional Procurement Facts The contract is not covered by the GPA. No EU funds were used for this procurement. The framework has a maximum value of €12,000,000. The framework uses a priority order system for assignment allocation. The contracting authority reserves the right to reject all tenders for any project. The municipality may conduct public competitive tendering outside the framework. Price is heavily weighted at 70%. The price evaluation uses a weighted personnel group comparison model. All three winners have declared subcontracting. The contract duration is 3 years (2026–2029). Market & Industry Perspective The Finnish municipal consulting and design market is competitive, with a mix of large international consultancies and medium-sized Finnish firms. Kirkkonummi, as part of the Helsinki metropolitan area, is a growing municipality with significant urban development needs. Key trends in this market include: Urban growth: Increasing development in the Helsinki metropolitan area Sustainable design: Growing focus on sustainable urban development Price competition: Strong emphasis on cost-effectiveness (70% weighting) Framework agreements: Long-term contracts providing stability Multi-supplier frameworks: Priority order systems for assignment allocation Economic Significance At €12 million, this framework represents a significant investment in urban development for Kirkkonummi Municipality. The contract will: Support urban growth: Design services for development projects Enable infrastructure: Engineering and construction planning Support employment: Work for three consulting firms Provide long-term stability: 3-year framework agreement Ensure quality: Three qualified suppliers with quality evaluation Future Procurement Opportunities With this framework now in place, future opportunities include: Re-tender: Expected after the 3-year framework period Related services: Additional urban development consulting services Subcontracting: Opportunities through the framework winners Other municipalities: Similar urban development frameworks in other Finnish municipalities Opportunities for Suppliers While this framework is awarded, opportunities remain for design and consulting firms: Subcontracting: All three winners declared subcontracting – opportunities available Re-tender: Prepare for the next procurement cycle Other municipalities: Similar urban development tenders in other Finnish municipalities Related services: Specialised design services not covered by the framework What Businesses Should Watch Kirkkonummi Municipality's future procurement notices Other Finnish municipal urban development tenders Subcontracting opportunities with framework winners Finnish procurement regulation changes Sustainable urban development trends FinlandTenders Procurement Intelligence This urban development design framework is a notable example of Finnish municipal consulting procurement. Several features stand out: Scale: €12 million over 3 years Price focus: 70% weighting on price Priority order: Structured assignment allocation system Multi-supplier: Three qualified suppliers selected Flexibility: Municipality reserves right to tender outside framework Subcontracting: All winners declared subcontracting For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of: Competitive pricing: Price accounts for 70% of evaluation Quality demonstration: Quality accounts for 30% Personnel costing: Weighted personnel group comparison model Regional presence: Being established in the Helsinki-Uusimaa region Capacity: Ability to serve multiple assignments under priority order Supplier Takeaways Offer competitive pricing – 70% of evaluation is price-based Demonstrate quality – 30% weighting Understand the weighted personnel group price comparison model Be prepared for the priority order allocation system Consider subcontracting opportunities with the three winners Monitor Finnish municipal urban development tenders Key Takeaways Kirkkonummi Municipality awarded a €12M urban development design framework Three winners: Sweco Finland Oy, FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy, Destia Oy Duration: 3 years (1 May 2026 – 30 April 2029) Evaluation: Price (70%), Quality (30%) Six tenders received, all electronic Priority order system for assignment allocation All winners declared subcontracting Not covered by GPA Conclusion This urban development design framework ensures that Kirkkonummi Municipality has access to three qualified suppliers for its design and consulting needs over the next three years. By selecting Sweco Finland Oy, FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy, and Destia Oy, the municipality has secured a diverse mix of large and medium-sized consultancies with complementary expertise. The 70% weighting on price reflects the importance of cost-effectiveness in municipal procurement, while the 30% quality weighting ensures that service quality is not compromised. The priority order system provides a structured approach to assignment allocation, while the contracting authority's flexibility to tender outside the framework ensures continued competition. For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of competitive pricing, quality demonstration, and understanding the weighted personnel group comparison model in Finnish municipal consulting procurements. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is Kirkkonummi Municipality? Ans: A local authority in the Helsinki-Uusimaa region of Finland, located on the southern coast west of Helsinki. Q: What is the value of the framework? Ans: €12,000,000. Q: Who are the winners? Ans: Sweco Finland Oy (large), FCG Rakennettu Ympäristö Oy (medium), and Destia Oy Asiantuntijapalvelut (large). Q: What services are covered? Ans: Architectural, construction, engineering, and inspection services for urban development. Q: What were the evaluation criteria? Ans: Price (70%) and Quality (30%). Q: How long is the contract? Ans: 3 years (1 May 2026 – 30 April 2029). Q: How many tenders were received? Ans: Six tenders were received, all submitted electronically. Q: Is this contract funded by the EU? Ans: No, the procurement is not financed with EU funds. Q: Is the contract covered by the GPA? Ans: No. Q: What is the review body? Ans: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Source: EU Official Journal, Contract Award Notice 588172-2026, OJ S 164/2026, published 26 August 2026. body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 20px; } table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 15px 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; } th { background-color: #f2f2f2; } ul { padding-left: 20px; } h2 { margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; }
View Details
Finnish Universities Award €1.89M SIEM and SOC Services Contract to Telia Cygate Oy
25 Aug 2026
Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (SEAMK), together with three other Finnish educational institutions, has awarded a SIEM and SOC services contract to Telia Cygate Oy. The €1.89 million contract covers a comprehensive security information and event management (SIEM) and security operations centre (SOC) solution for the participating organisations, with a duration of 48 months. Introduction Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (SEAMK), acting as the lead contracting authority on behalf of four Finnish educational institutions, has conducted an open procedure for the procurement of SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) and SOC (Security Operations Centre) services. The participating organisations are: Seinäjoen Ammattikorkeakoulu Oy (SEAMK), Seinäjoen koulutuskuntayhtymä (SEDU), Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu Oy, and Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu. Each organisation makes its own independent procurement decision regarding the joint procurement. The contract, valued at €1,888,040, has been awarded to Telia Cygate Oy. The contract runs for 48 months and covers SIEM and SOC services as a comprehensive solution. Subcontracting is not permitted. The procurement was conducted under the Finnish Procurement Act (1397/2016) as an open procedure exceeding the EU threshold. Why This Contract Matters This contract ensures that four Finnish educational institutions have robust cybersecurity monitoring and response capabilities to protect their digital infrastructure and sensitive data. This contract matters because it: Enhances cybersecurity: Provides SIEM and SOC capabilities Multi-institution collaboration: Four educational institutions participating Significant value: €1,888,040 contract Long-term commitment: 48-month contract duration Comprehensive solution: Single provider for the complete SIEM/SOC solution SME participation: All bidders were SMEs (including the winner) Strategic procurement: Includes human rights due diligence in global supply chains Contract Timeline Previous notice: 1f2cb260-6bbc-44f7-bc56-30a5ea54e52b-01 Winner chosen: 21 May 2026 Contract concluded: 25 June 2026 Contract duration: 48 months Notice published: 25 August 2026 (OJ S 163/2026) Separate contracts: Each participating organisation signed an independent contract Contract Overview Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences (SEAMK) conducted an open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act (1397/2016). Key features include: Single lot: One contract covering SIEM and SOC services as a comprehensive solution Total awarded value: €1,888,040.00 Duration: 48 months No framework agreement: Direct services contract Evaluation: Price (75%), Quality (25%) Winner: Telia Cygate Oy (SME) No subcontracting permitted No EU funding Key Contract Details Detail Information Contracting authorities Seinäjoen Ammattikorkeakoulu Oy (Lead), Seinäjoen koulutuskuntayhtymä (SEDU), Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu Oy, Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu Contract title SIEM ja SOC-palvelu (SIEM and SOC Services) Main CPV 72000000 IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support Additional CPVs 48730000 (Security software package), 48732000 (Data security software package) Procedure type Open procedure (standard regime) Legal basis EU Directive 2014/24/EU; Finnish Procurement Act (1397/2016) Awarded value (EUR) €1,888,040.00 Number of lots 1 Contract duration 48 months EU funding None Covered by GPA Yes Evaluation criteria Price (75%), Quality (25%) Location Various locations across Finland Subcontracting Not permitted (No subcontracting declared) Number of tenders 3 (all from SMEs) Strategic procurement Human rights due diligence in global supply chains Participating Organisations Organisation Type Location Role Seinäjoen Ammattikorkeakoulu Oy (SEAMK) University of Applied Sciences Seinäjoki Lead Buyer, Contract Signatory Seinäjoen koulutuskuntayhtymä (SEDU) Education Consortium Seinäjoki Buyer, Contract Signatory Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu Oy University of Applied Sciences Kokkola Buyer, Contract Signatory Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu University of Applied Sciences Pori Buyer, Contract Signatory Services Scope – SIEM and SOC The contract covers a comprehensive SIEM and SOC solution, including: SIEM (Security Information and Event Management): Collection, analysis, and correlation of security events from across the organisations' IT infrastructure SOC (Security Operations Centre): Security monitoring, threat detection, incident response, and security operations services Comprehensive solution: The supplier must offer the complete SIEM and SOC service as an integrated package No partial bids: Partial tenders or alternative tenders are not accepted unless specifically requested Language: All tender documents and bids must be in Finnish Confidential Procurement Material Due to the sensitive nature of the procurement, access to certain procurement documents was restricted: Restricted access: Under Section 69.3 of the Finnish Procurement Act, not all procurement documents could be made freely available Confidential material: Appendix 4 (Background Information Form) contains classified information Access conditions: Confidential material is only provided to bidders who meet the ESPD eligibility requirements Request process: Bidders must send a request and confirm they meet eligibility requirements to laskenta@learnpoint.fi Verification: The contracting authority may request clarifications on eligibility before releasing confidential material Destruction obligation: Bidders must destroy the material when no longer needed or when the procurement procedure ends Expert advisor: Learnpoint ICT Oy acts as the buyer's authorised expert advisor Evaluation Criteria The contract was awarded based on two main criteria: Price (75%) Evaluated based on the total cost (kokonaishinta) using the comparison price formed from the prices indicated on the bidder's price form (Appendix 2). Quality (25%) Quality points are determined based on quality differences between bidders who meet the requirements. Quality-evaluated items are marked in Appendix 1 with maximum point values. The comparison criteria and their weightings are provided in the scoring table (Appendix 3). Procurement Analysis Procedure: Open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU and the Finnish Procurement Act (1397/2016). Competition: Three tenders were received, all from SME bidders. SME participation: All three bidders were micro, small, or medium-sized enterprises (including the winner). International participation: No bids from outside Finland or from other EEA countries. Subcontracting: Not permitted – none of the bidders declared subcontracting. No EU funding: The procurement is not financed with EU funds. No framework agreement: This is a direct services contract. No dynamic purchasing system used. Accelerated procedure: No. Strategic procurement: Includes human rights due diligence in global supply chains. Review body: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Bidder Comparison Bidder Tender Value (EUR) Subcontracting Rank Telia Cygate Oy €1,888,040 No Winner Netox Oy €2,456,400 No Not ranked NetNordic Finland Oy €2,674,640 No Not ranked About the Contracting Authorities Seinäjoen Ammattikorkeakoulu Oy (SEAMK) is a university of applied sciences located in Seinäjoki, Finland, providing higher education in various fields. It acts as the lead contracting authority for this joint procurement. Seinäjoen koulutuskuntayhtymä (SEDU) is an education consortium providing vocational education and training in the Seinäjoki region. Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu Oy is a university of applied sciences based in Kokkola, Finland. Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu is a university of applied sciences based in Pori, Finland. About the Winning Supplier Telia Cygate Oy is a Finnish IT and cybersecurity company, part of the Telia Group. The company specialises in security solutions, cloud services, and IT infrastructure. Size: Micro, small, or medium enterprise (SME) Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 0752421-0 Subcontracting: Not permitted Strategic Procurement – Human Rights Due Diligence The procurement includes a social objective: Social objective promoted: Human rights due diligence in global supply chains Significance: This reflects the growing importance of supply chain responsibility in Finnish public procurement Implementation: Bidders must demonstrate commitment to human rights due diligence in their operations and supply chains Additional Procurement Facts The contract is covered by the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). No EU funds were used for this procurement. The procurement was conducted electronically via Cloudia procurement platform. All tender documents are in Finnish, and bids must be submitted in Finnish. Each participating organisation makes an independent procurement decision. The contract duration is 48 months. No framework agreement is used. Partial tenders or alternative tenders are not accepted. Learnpoint ICT Oy acts as the buyer's expert advisor. Confidential procurement material is restricted to eligible bidders. All three bidders were SMEs. Appeal deadlines follow the Finnish Procurement Act: 14 days for procurement review requests, 14 days for appeals to the Market Court. Market & Industry Perspective The Finnish cybersecurity services market is growing rapidly, driven by increasing cyber threats and regulatory requirements. Educational institutions are investing in SIEM and SOC capabilities to protect their digital infrastructure and sensitive data. Key trends in this market include: Growing demand: Increasing investment in cybersecurity across all sectors Managed security services: Outsourcing SIEM and SOC functions to specialist providers SME participation: Small and medium-sized firms are active in this market Strategic procurement: Growing focus on supply chain responsibility and human rights Long-term contracts: 4-year contracts provide stability for service providers Economic Significance At €1.89 million, this contract represents a significant investment in cybersecurity for Finnish educational institutions. The contract will: Enhance cybersecurity: Provide SIEM and SOC capabilities for four institutions Protect sensitive data: Secure educational and administrative data Support compliance: Meet regulatory and security requirements Support SME: Winner is an SME Enable collaboration: Joint procurement across multiple institutions Future Procurement Opportunities With this contract now in place, future opportunities include: Re-tender: Expected after the 48-month contract period Additional security services: Related services not covered by this contract Other educational institutions: Similar SIEM/SOC procurements in the Finnish education sector Cybersecurity consulting: Security assessments and advisory services Opportunities for Suppliers While this contract is awarded, opportunities remain for cybersecurity service providers: Re-tender: Prepare for the next procurement cycle Other educational institutions: Similar procurements at other Finnish universities Public sector: SIEM/SOC services for other public sector organisations Managed security services: Growing demand for outsourced security monitoring What Businesses Should Watch Finnish educational institution procurement notices Public sector cybersecurity tenders in Finland SIEM and SOC service developments Supply chain responsibility and human rights requirements Changes to Finnish cybersecurity regulations FinlandTenders Procurement Intelligence This SIEM and SOC services contract is a notable example of Finnish educational sector cybersecurity procurement. Several features stand out: Scale: €1.89 million across four educational institutions Multi-institution: Joint procurement with independent contracts SME focus: All bidders were SMEs Price focus: 75% weighting on price Security: Restricted access to confidential procurement material Strategic: Human rights due diligence requirement Duration: 48-month contract provides long-term stability For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of: Competitive pricing: Price accounts for 75% of evaluation Quality demonstration: Quality accounts for 25% Security expertise: SIEM and SOC capabilities SME participation: SMEs can compete effectively Supply chain responsibility: Human rights due diligence is increasingly important Collaborative procurement: Ability to serve multiple institutions Supplier Takeaways Offer competitive pricing – 75% of evaluation is price-based Demonstrate quality – 25% weighting on quality Develop SIEM and SOC capabilities and expertise Consider SME status as an advantage Show commitment to human rights due diligence in supply chains Be prepared for restricted access to confidential procurement material Monitor Finnish educational and public sector cybersecurity tenders Key Takeaways SEAMK led a joint procurement of SIEM and SOC services Four educational institutions participated Contract awarded to Telia Cygate Oy for €1,888,040 Duration: 48 months Evaluation: Price (75%), Quality (25%) Three tenders received, all from SMEs No subcontracting permitted Strategic procurement includes human rights due diligence Confidential procurement material had restricted access Conclusion This SIEM and SOC services contract represents a significant investment in cybersecurity for four Finnish educational institutions. By conducting a joint procurement led by SEAMK, the participating organisations have achieved economies of scale and consistency in their security operations. The 75% price / 25% quality weighting reflects the importance of cost-effectiveness in this procurement, while the quality component ensures that service quality is not compromised. The participation of three SME bidders (including the winner) demonstrates the accessibility of this procurement to smaller firms. The inclusion of human rights due diligence in global supply chains as a strategic objective reflects the growing importance of supply chain responsibility in Finnish public procurement. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is being procured? Ans: SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) and SOC (Security Operations Centre) services. Q: Who are the participating organisations? Ans: Seinäjoen Ammattikorkeakoulu (SEAMK), Seinäjoen koulutuskuntayhtymä (SEDU), Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu, and Satakunnan ammattikorkeakoulu. Q: What is the value of the contract? Ans: €1,888,040.00 (Telia Cygate Oy's winning bid). Q: Who is the winner? Ans: Telia Cygate Oy, a Finnish cybersecurity and IT company. Q: What were the evaluation criteria? Ans: Price (75%) and Quality (25%). Q: How long is the contract? Ans: 48 months. Q: How many tenders were received? Ans: Three tenders were received, all from SMEs. Q: Is subcontracting permitted? Ans: No – all bidders declared no subcontracting. Q: Why was access to some procurement documents restricted? Ans: Due to the confidential nature of the procurement material, access was restricted under Section 69.3 of the Finnish Procurement Act. Q: What is the review body? Ans: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Source: EU Official Journal, Contract Award Notice 585044-2026, OJ S 163/2026, published 25 August 2026. body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 20px; } table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 15px 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; } th { background-color: #f2f2f2; } ul { padding-left: 20px; } h2 { margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; }
View Details
Keminmaa Municipality Awards €1.09 Million Electricity Supply Contract to Mind Energy Oy
24 Aug 2026
Keminmaan kunta (Keminmaa Municipality) and Keminmaan Vuokra-asunnot Oy have awarded a four-year electricity supply contract to Mind Energy Oy. The contract, valued at €1,085,650, covers electricity procurement for municipal operations and municipal housing company properties in the Lapland region of Finland. Seven tenders were received in a competitive open procedure. Introduction Keminmaan kunta (Keminmaa Municipality) and its associated municipal housing company Keminmaan Vuokra-asunnot Oy have conducted an open procedure for the procurement of electricity supply. The contract covers electricity for municipal operations and housing company properties in the Lapland region of northern Finland. The contract, valued at €1,085,650, runs from 1 January 2027 to 31 December 2030 (four years). The winning bidder, Mind Energy Oy, a large Finnish energy company based in Vantaa, will supply electricity with pricing based on margins, quarter-spot deliveries, and power-based price hedges. The procurement was conducted under the EU standard regime, with the selection criterion being the lowest price (most economically advantageous). Why This Contract Matters This contract ensures a stable and cost-effective electricity supply for municipal services and public housing in the Lapland region. This contract matters because it: Supports municipal services: Ensures electricity for Keminmaa Municipality operations Benefits public housing: Covers Keminmaan Vuokra-asunnot Oy properties Significant value: €1,085,650 contract Long-term stability: Four-year supply agreement (2027–2030) Strong competition: Seven tenders received Regional importance: Serves Lapland region (NUTS: FI1D7) Price transparency: Margins and pass-through costs clearly defined Contract Timeline Previous notice: d6becddd-8d00-426b-841e-569e12e0f36a-01 Contract concluded: 20 August 2026 Contract start date: 1 January 2027 Contract end date: 31 December 2030 Duration: 4 years Notice published: 24 August 2026 (OJ S 162/2026) Contract Overview Keminmaa Municipality conducted an open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU. Key features include: Single lot: One contract covering all electricity supply Total awarded value: €1,085,650.00 Duration: 4 years (1 January 2027 – 31 December 2030) No framework agreement: Direct works contract Evaluation: Lowest price (100% price-based) Winner: Mind Energy Oy No subcontracting declared Key Contract Details Detail Information Contracting authorities Keminmaan kunta, Keminmaan Vuokra-asunnot Oy Contract title Sähköenergian hankinta (Electricity procurement) Main CPV 09310000 Electricity Procedure type Open procedure (standard regime) Legal basis EU Directive 2014/24/EU Awarded value (EUR) €1,085,650.00 Number of lots 1 Contract duration 4 years (1 January 2027 – 31 December 2030) Framework agreement No framework agreement EU funding None Covered by GPA Yes Evaluation criteria Lowest price (100%) Location Lapland region, Finland (NUTS: FI1D7) Subcontracting No subcontracting declared Number of tenders 7 (all submitted electronically) Pricing Structure The electricity supply contract features a transparent pricing structure based on: Electricity seller's margins: Fixed margins added to the electricity price Quarter-spot deliveries: Pricing based on quarter-ahead spot market prices Power-based price hedges: Hedging arrangements to reduce price risk Fingrid balance service: Pass-through of production and consumption volume fees Datahub fees: Pass-through of Datahub connection point fees Optional Services The contract includes the following optional service: Origin guarantees (alkuperätakuut): The customer may purchase origin guarantees as additional orders (up to the volume of the contract period). The estimated price level of origin guarantees has been considered in the estimated value of the procurement. About the Contracting Authorities Keminmaan kunta (Keminmaa Municipality) is a regional authority in Lapland, northern Finland. The municipality serves a population of approximately 8,000 residents and is located near the city of Kemi. Keminmaan Vuokra-asunnot Oy is a public-law body (body governed by public law) providing rental housing in the Keminmaa area. The company is responsible for municipal housing and community amenities. About the Winning Supplier Mind Energy Oy is a large Finnish energy company based in Vantaa, in the Helsinki metropolitan area. The company specialises in electricity supply and energy services. Size: Large enterprise Headquarters: Teknobulevardi 3-5, Vantaa, Finland (NUTS: FI1B1) Registration number: 2116967-3 No subcontracting declared Evaluation Criteria The contract was awarded based on the most economically advantageous tender, with the selection criterion being the lowest price. Criteria: Lowest price (100% weighting) Award criterion number: 100 Evaluation points: Points-based weighting Procurement Analysis Procedure: Open procedure under the standard regime, governed by EU Directive 2014/24/EU. Competition: Strong competition with seven tenders received. Electronic submission: All seven tenders were submitted electronically. No subcontracting: The winner, Mind Energy Oy, declared no subcontracting. No framework agreement: This is a direct works contract. No dynamic purchasing system used. Accelerated procedure: No. Review body: Markkinaoikeus (Market Court of Finland). Additional Procurement Facts The contract is covered by the WTO's Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). No EU funds were used for this procurement. Origin guarantees are available as an optional service. All seven tenders were submitted electronically. The contract is a direct contract (not a framework agreement). The price structure includes pass-through of Fingrid and Datahub fees. Review deadlines are provided to parties upon decision notification. Market & Industry Perspective The Finnish electricity market is competitive, with a mix of large energy companies and regional suppliers. Municipalities and public entities increasingly procure electricity through competitive tendering to achieve price transparency and cost savings. Key trends in this market include: Price transparency: Clear margin-based pricing models Renewable energy: Growing demand for origin guarantees Competitive tendering: Municipalities actively procuring electricity Pass-through pricing: Transparent pass-through of grid and Datahub fees Long-term contracts: Four-year agreements provide price stability Economic Significance At €1,085,650, this contract represents a significant energy procurement for the Keminmaa region. The contract will: Ensure municipal services: Power for municipal operations Support public housing: Electricity for Keminmaan Vuokra-asunnot properties Provide price stability: Fixed margins over four years Reduce price risk: Power-based hedging arrangements Support competition: Seven bidders competed for the contract Future Procurement Opportunities With this contract now in place until 2030, future opportunities include: Re-tender in 2030: The contract is expected to be re-tendered before expiry Origin guarantees: Optional renewable energy certificates Other municipalities: Similar electricity procurements in Finnish municipalities Energy services: Related energy efficiency or consulting services Opportunities for Suppliers While this contract is awarded, opportunities remain for electricity suppliers: Re-tender in 2030: Prepare for the next procurement cycle Other Finnish municipalities: Similar electricity procurements across Finland Municipal housing companies: Public housing energy procurement Origin guarantees: Supply of renewable energy certificates What Businesses Should Watch Keminmaa Municipality's future procurement notices Other Finnish municipal electricity tenders Energy market price trends and hedging strategies Changes to Finnish energy regulations Demand for origin guarantees and renewable energy FinlandTenders Procurement Intelligence This electricity supply contract is a notable example of municipal energy procurement in Finland. Several features stand out: Scale: €1,085,650 over four years Competition: Seven tenders received Price focus: Lowest price (100% weighting) Pricing transparency: Clear margin and pass-through structure Hedging: Power-based price hedges to reduce risk Optional services: Origin guarantees available For suppliers, this procurement highlights the importance of: Competitive pricing: Lowest price is the only criterion Transparent pricing models: Clear margin structure Risk management: Hedging arrangements for price stability Regional presence: Ability to serve Lapland region Pass-through capability: Handling of grid and Datahub fees Supplier Takeaways Offer competitive pricing – 100% of evaluation is price-based Provide clear, transparent margin structures Demonstrate hedging and risk management capabilities Ensure ability to handle pass-through of grid and Datahub fees Consider origin guarantees as an optional value-add Monitor Finnish municipal electricity procurements Key Takeaways Keminmaa Municipality awarded a €1,085,650 electricity contract to Mind Energy Oy Four-year duration (1 January 2027 – 31 December 2030) Seven tenders received – strong competition Evaluation: Lowest price (100%) Pricing: Margins + quarter-spot + power-based hedges Pass-through of Fingrid and Datahub fees Origin guarantees available as optional service No subcontracting declared Conclusion This electricity supply contract ensures a stable and cost-effective energy supply for Keminmaa Municipality and its public housing company for four years. By selecting Mind Energy Oy on the basis of the lowest price, the contracting authorities have secured competitive pricing with a transparent margin structure. The seven tenders received demonstrate strong competition in the Finnish electricity market. The contract's pricing structure—based on margins, quarter-spot deliveries, and power-based hedges—provides both transparency and risk management for the municipality. As Finnish municipalities continue to procure energy through competitive tendering, similar opportunities will arise for electricity suppliers with competitive pricing, transparent models, and regional delivery capabilities. Frequently Asked Questions Q: What is Keminmaan kunta? Ans: Keminmaa Municipality, a regional authority in Lapland, northern Finland, serving approximately 8,000 residents. Q: What is the value of the contract? Ans: €1,085,650.00. Q: Who is the winner? Ans: Mind Energy Oy, a large Finnish energy company based in Vantaa. Q: What is being procured? Ans: Electricity (CPV 09310000). Q: What were the evaluation criteria? Ans: Lowest price (100% weighting). Q: How long is the contract? Ans: 4 years, from 1 January 2027 to 31 December 2030. Q: How many tenders were received? Ans: Seven tenders were received, all submitted electronically. Q: Is this contract funded by the EU? Ans: No, the procurement is not financed with EU funds. Q: What optional services are available? Ans: Origin guarantees (alkuperätakuut) for renewable energy certificates. Source: EU Official Journal, Contract Award Notice 582077-2026, OJ S 162/2026, published 24 August 2026. body { font-family: sans-serif; margin: 20px; } table { border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; margin: 15px 0; } th, td { border: 1px solid #ddd; padding: 8px; text-align: left; vertical-align: top; } th { background-color: #f2f2f2; } ul { padding-left: 20px; } h2 { margin-top: 30px; } h3 { margin-top: 20px; }
View Details